Andrew Morton wrote:
> > There's also the custom list, hash and debug code. We should either
> >
> > a) remove them or
> >
> > b) generify them and submit as standalone works or
> >
> > c) justify them as custom-to-reiser4 and leave them as-is.
On 6/29/05, Hans Reiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> either b) or c) is ok with me for the list code. The debug code should
> be c) I think.
>
> Probably vs can offer a more detailed and accurate opinion,
I completely agree that the current state of the generic hashing
facilities is somewhat poor but I fail to see why you can't use
<linux/list.h>.
As for the debugging code, I would love to see that turned into
something generic (every subsystem has their own now) but it is
definitely not something that should stop you from merging.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
