On 01/27/2011 01:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it. They'd >> still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues. > I´m not following wrt patents. It´s the same bloody code. > And why didn´t it prevent Fedora from including OO.o in the past?. Openoffice.org package in Fedora had a few features removed due to such issues. Any new maintainer has to take into consideration the same problems as well. Rahul -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines