On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 16:43:08 -0300, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it. They'd > > still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues. > > I´m not following wrt patents. It´s the same bloody code. > And why didn´t it prevent Fedora from including OO.o in the past?. It did block including at least one feature that is normally available when getting the prebuilt images. If you want details that information should be documented in the src rpm. The same features would need to be blocked in new builds unless something changes with respect to the patents. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
