On 01/22/2011 04:18 PM, Alex wrote: >> > The reason is that the Fedora kernel team doesn't want to support out of >> > mainline, kernel mods. And Digium doesn't want dahdi in mainline. I believe >> > their reasoning here is they want to keep control of a dual licensed code >> > base so they can sell non-GPL version to businesses that don't want to use >> > GPL'd code. > Good info, thanks. Paid a couple hundred dollars for this card. Just > wish I didn't have to rely on someone other than myself, my operating > system vendor, or my hardware vendor to keep the card working. > >> > ATRPMS also do dahdi kmods, but you can't rebuild the rpms on a stock Fedora >> > system. It's probably not that hard to do, but I never found clear >> > documentation on what was needed. > Yeah, also tried that and found similar results -- virtually no > documentation and some magic to get it to compile. > > It's now working with the precompiled ATRPMS, but it screws up other > dependencies. > > Thanks again, > Alex Truth be told, there's just as much magic in what RPMFusion's kmod2 scheme does compared to the kmdl scheme used at ATRPMs. Here's the kmod2 scheme described at RPMFusion: http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 Lot's of magic. -A -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
