Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 08:07 -0300 schrieb Fernando Cassia:
> The truth will be seen when both LO and OpenOffice.org start diverging
> and when Oracle decides to put several hundred developers to work on
> the next major version number full time, if Ubuntu/Fedora and hobbyist
> programmers in their spare time can match it. It´ll be fun to watch,

I'm not shure if it is really fun. 


> but I surely think the forking wasn´t needed, and it was cause because
> of politcs, FUD, and paranoia.
> 
> "That´s the way OSS works" seems to be an excuse to fork, fork, fork.


No, not fork. Fork is a kind of side effect.

It is a matter of engagement and attractiveness (and cooperation/
coordination). FUD, paranoia and the like are surface phenomena if
something is going wrong under the hood. Part of each successful project
is to take care to keep its developers onboard. Something went wrong
here during the Sun / Oracle merger.


Peter

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux