On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > F14 was done without a "mass rebuild" to rename fc13 to fc14. > > If you find something breaks because of a newer fc13, you may need to > downgrade, otherwise if not broken. Maybe let them play together. I understand now, thanks. I just wasn't expecting that and so I was alarmed when I saw lots of packages that weren't fc14. The system is apparently working fine, but I just wasn't sure. However, there are a couple strange things that aren't just explained by not renaming (supposedly unchanged) packages. 1. I had a dependency conflict between the python3 and alchemy packages; in which 'yum update' failed completely until I removed alchemy. (And this is what initially got me looking at all the version numbers anyway) 2. If you upgrade from F13 to F14 ... AND you have a fully updated F13 system (as of 2010-11-05); then you actually may have to downgrade to get to F14. There are apparently at least 7 packages which have newer versions right now in F13 than they do in F14 !! I am supposing that issue 2 is just caused by upstream patches making it through the F13 release stream faster than the F14 stream?? -- Deron Meranda http://deron.meranda.us/ -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
