Paul Cartwright wrote: > On Wed October 13 2010, JD wrote: >> Yeah... well, I do not have an old drive. It is only 3 years old. >> (DVD+-R) 16X, RW-8X, CDR-24X. Output says it is MMC. >> $ wodim -checkdrive dev=/dev/sr0 >> Device type : Removable CD-ROM >> Version : 5 >> Response Format: 2 >> Capabilities : >> Vendor_info : 'Slimtype' >> Identification : 'DVD A DS8A1P ' >> Revision : 'CX17' >> Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW. >> Using generic SCSI-3/mmc DVD-R(W) driver (mmc_mdvd). >> Driver flags : SWABAUDIO BURNFREE >> Supported modes: PACKET SAO > > mine says: > # wodim -checkdrive dev=/dev/sr0 > Device type : Removable CD-ROM > Version : 5 > Response Format: 2 > Capabilities : > Vendor_info : 'HL-DT-ST' > Identification : 'DVD+-RW GSA-H31N' > Revision : 'B106' > Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW. > Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). > Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE > Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R16 RAW/R96P RAW/R96R > > > and I normlly burn with speed=4. but I use: > cdrecord -v speed=4 $1.iso > when I do man cdrecord, it gives me the man page for wodim.. > # dpkg --list|grep cdrecord > ii cdrecord 9:1.1.10-1 > Dummy transition package for wodim > As I've said before, if Fedora doesn't like the license which comes with cdrecord, they should leave it out and not put in a different package with the same name. The morality of putting out an ersatz product who's problems are attributed by users to the genuine software is pretty damn poor. It's a "Dummy transition package for wodim" because they think anyone who doesn't notice it's not the real deal is a dummy, maybe? -- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
