On Sunday 19 September 2010 04:41 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > How about 2D performance for something like OpenOffice.org? Would it > still be better to get the ATI chipset vice the nVidia one or is it > neutral at that point? > I use an nVIDIA Quadro with Ubuntu Lucid at work and the Radeon HD at home with Fedora 13, XFCE on both machines and no compiz or any other 3D desktop environment. I _have_ to use the proprietary drivers for the nVidia chipset to get decent 2D performance out of my dual monitor setup. Which mostly involves things like Firefox, OpenOffice, Thunderbird, and some programming tools. Whereas at home I play 3D games and have very stable 2D performance, again with a dual monitor setup, and all of what I do at work. In my experience, with the newer chipsets the proprietary drivers are probably needed for both manufacturers. But for older chipsets, I would prefer having an ATI with FOSS drivers. And remember, all chipsets will be old someday. > James McKenzie -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
