Hi, > I'd concur with Athmane Madjoudj, you might have a bad anti-aliasing > option picked for your system. And some fonts do that better than > others. > > If you have the liberation fonts installed, they do a good job of > replacing the usual Windows-expected fonts, and freely. Your computer's > much more likely to substitute a good choice of font, rather than a bad > one, when you don't have the Windows font that the author wanted to use. I do have the liberation fonts installed: # rpm -qva|grep -i liberation liberation-serif-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch liberation-fonts-common-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch I've also tried to change the anti-aliasing options to a few of the others, but the page still mostly looks the same. > FWIW, I find it helpful that when an image is posted that the actual > link also be posted so that folks looking at it can compare what they > see on their system alongside of what the OP is seeing. Yes, should have thought of this. This was really just an example -- for the most part, fonts in the browser look blurry. Other ideas greatly appreciated. Thanks, Alex -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
