Re: kqemu - useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>  On 08/13/2010 09:05 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Given that RPMfusion still offers it, I would say that the developers have the
>>> latest hardware and the budget that implies, and regard two years old as not
>>> worth supporting
>>
>> Actually,  it has nothing to do with that but a poorly maintained
>> codebase.
>>
> I think we are saying almost the same thing. The codebase is poorly maintained
> because the people working on the drivers are not spending time testing changes
> to see if they break old cards. I assume the developers have the latest because
> (a) they are adding features using the 3D features, and (b) if they were using
> the 2-3 year old cards they wouldn't be developing anything, because they would
> be running in text or VESA mode.

I think you may be confusing your frustrations over kqemu and nouveau
with each other..

-- 
Chris
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux