Re: kqemu - useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  On 08/13/2010 09:05 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Given that RPMfusion still offers it, I would say that the developers have the 
>> latest hardware and the budget that implies, and regard two years old as not 
>> worth supporting
> 
> Actually,  it has nothing to do with that but a poorly maintained
> codebase. 
> 
I think we are saying almost the same thing. The codebase is poorly maintained 
because the people working on the drivers are not spending time testing changes 
to see if they break old cards. I assume the developers have the latest because 
(a) they are adding features using the 3D features, and (b) if they were using 
the 2-3 year old cards they wouldn't be developing anything, because they would 
be running in text or VESA mode.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux