On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, JD wrote: > > On 06/22/2010 04:40 AM, Tim was caught red-handed while writing:: > > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:31 -0700, JD wrote: > > > >> Also, WPA encryotion can be broken by a notebook PC in under 1 minute. > >> WPA (and WPA2) encryption that uses TKP can also be broken in under 1 > >> minute. So far AES seems to be invulnerable (as far whatever has been > >> printed publicly). > >> > > I'd heard that WEP was crap, years ago. But I hadn't heard that WPA2 > > was that easily crackable, yet. > > > > > A Japanese team presented a paper that all wpa versions that use TKIP > can be broken in under a minute and they proved it. TKIP is crap. > And as I said, the team reported that they were not able to crack AES. > So, AES is what people should use with WPA2. > > Cheers, > > JD Indeed that is what is reported but I want to see them so that by coming into a Starbucks . In any case the communication is unencrypted there. -- ======================================================================= Integrity has no need for rules. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
