Re: bad HD sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/19/2010 03:01 PM, Alan Cox was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:43:19 -0700
> JD<jd1008@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>    
>> Greetings,
>> I have a 500GB hd which smarts daemon says has 1 re-mapped sector, and
>> 129 bad sectors.
>> How is it possible to have 129 bad sectors, but only 1 re-mapped sector?
>> Did the HD have only 1 spare sector when I purchased it?
>> Is that possible?
>> Drive was purchased brand new in factory sealed box.
>>      
> I expect the smart data is reporting sectors marked bad in testing and
> formatting up before it was sold. All media has some bad sectors that are
> never used.
>    

Is there a way to tell smart daemon to ignore the bad sector list
that comes from the manufacturer?
smartd keep reporting:
messages:Jun 19 16:16:39 localhost smartd[1378]: Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], 
128 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
messages:Jun 19 16:16:39 localhost smartd[1378]: Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], 
128 Offline uncorrectable sectors

yet I am not seeing any apps reporting read/write errors to this drive.

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux