Re: bad HD sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/19/2010 03:01 PM, Alan Cox was caught red-handed while writing::
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:43:19 -0700
> JD<jd1008@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>    
>> Greetings,
>> I have a 500GB hd which smarts daemon says has 1 re-mapped sector, and
>> 129 bad sectors.
>> How is it possible to have 129 bad sectors, but only 1 re-mapped sector?
>> Did the HD have only 1 spare sector when I purchased it?
>> Is that possible?
>> Drive was purchased brand new in factory sealed box.
>>      
> I expect the smart data is reporting sectors marked bad in testing and
> formatting up before it was sold. All media has some bad sectors that are
> never used.
>    

That's very interesting. When I first had installed
the drive (1.9 years ago), on FC7, I did not have the
smarts daemon running. I only enabled it in FC10 I think
(I cannot recall when I actually turned it on).
I started seeing the problem right away when I had enabled
the smarts daemon.

Assuming what you say is the case, I guess I should ignore
the smarts report until the number of failed sectors rise higher than
129. It has been at 129 for as far as I can recall.

Cheers,

JD
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux