On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Agreed, but it's worth mentioning that CentOS tracks RHEL releases and > is available at no cost (and consequently no paid support). As my boss said it when I presented the budget forecast for my RHEL licenses; "It's less than the rounding errors in our other license budgets". Paying for basic support for RHEL should not be a problem. Actually, my biggest motivation for running CentOS on development and test servers is to avoid the technical part of the licensing hassle. And of course I run CentOS at home. -- birger -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
