--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Chris Kloiber <ckloiber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ah yes, but it's a bitc^H^H^H^H bit > difficult to control/find your desired content, and I don't > think it will scale to a tiny "always on top" window in the > corner of your desktop so you can work while watching, > similar to the popout feature. Buckets full of FAIL, IMHO. > > -- Chris Kloiber I agree. In designing the user interface "coolness" was paramount, not functionality, a bad recipe. That pervasive philosophy coupled with arrogance--consumers really don't know what they want--you end up with crap that looks "cool," but lacks ease and simplicity of operation. KISS is my advice to the designers of Huludesktop. B > > > On 03/02/2010 12:25 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 03/01/2010 11:15 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > >> Thanks for the link. Read numerous posts and > replies. Several people said by wrapping the 32-bit > flash plugin on their 64-bit systems/browsers, they got Hulu > to work. However, I never was happy with the > performance of the wrapped flash plugin. It was worse > than the 64-bit Alpha. Maybe, I'll just install 32-bit > Firefox and use it for those times I need it now that I know > the problem is not exclusively a 64-bit OS problem. I > already have a few 32-bit apps on my system. So, > another one isn't going to bother me. (I'm not a > 64-bit only fanatic.) > >> > > > > Just use huludesktop. It will work fine with the > 64-bit plugin. They > > provide a 64-bit RPM on hulu.com. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
