On 01/20/2010 12:07 AM, Tony Nelson wrote: > On 10-01-19 08:02:25, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > ... >> The better question would be: Why had the inconstency this mesa-push >> has caused not been caught in advance to pushing this package? >> >> IMO, somebody at Fedora's Release Management hass not done his >> homework. > > See Dave Airlie's post to devel "libdrm vs mesa updates - update group > for bodhi?" That's not my point: My point is: Why are package which apparently break package dependencies being pushed to public repos rsp. why does rel-eng not catch them before they break public repos? I.e. I am not pointing at the "packager/package maintainer", but at Fedora's release managers/Fedora's release engineering. Ralf -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
