William Case wrote: > Hi Ed; > > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 10:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> William Case wrote: >> >>>>> All the problems seemed to have started with this advice I >>>>> received from bugzilla: >>>>> >>>>> ---------- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554236 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > >> OK.... But I am still not clear about your bugzilla.... >> >> In your bugzilla you say.... >> > > >> So, it seems you have no Windows machines and neither of your F12 >> systems are running samba. But, since you do have a /etc/samba/lmhosts >> you do have samba-common installed. Chances are you also have >> samba-client installed. >> >> Now, when you bring up nautilus you open the places "network" and see a >> "Windows Network" icon. This is perfectly correct since that is the >> purpose of places/network...to show Windows Shares. >> >> Now, if I were you I'd run wireshark to capture packet information using >> (initially) a capture filter of "port 137" and see what you get when you >> double click on "Windows Network". >> >> > That is exactly what I want to know. I did not want to see Windows > shares because I knew I had no Windows on my network. When it kept > showing up I couldn't find or figure out what Windows/samba files were > producing the 'Windows Network'. I guess I didn't explain myself very > well because no one before you could grasp on to what I was looking for. > > As often happens, what started out as a small task to remove a minor > irritation has blossomed into a two day event taking up several people's > time. I apologize for that. > > I am currently installing Wireshark. If your are interested I will tell > you what I get and what I have removed (moved aside). > > And then I will take another run at getting Tigervnc running, which is > where I originally started. > > Well.... IMHO, I think you are on a witch hunt..... :-) Having the place holder of "Windows Network" which isn't harming anything and trying to make it disappear by doing "stuff" is IMHO pointless. Also, you've taken some advice in the bugzilla that seems to me very ill advised. You've wiped out /var/lib/samba which belongs to the samba-common package. Now, if you decide to remove that package you may run into difficulties or if the package is updated at some point it may cause you grief. I don't know why folks go in and willy nilly start deleting things or advise folks to do that. IMHO, if you don't plan to run any samba server or samba client you should simply remove any package related to samba. That would include gvfs-smb and pam_smb. And, FWIW, the removal of gvfs-smb will remove "Windows Network" from nautilus. -- You've been Berkeley'ed!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
