Re: To hyper-thread or not to hyper-thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:44 -0700, Greg Woods wrote: 
> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:18 +0100, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The problem of the Pentium 4 D: It is not really a dual core one.
> > Hyper-Threading means: There is one core with two execution paths, which
> > means some of the common CPU features, but not all, are present twice.
> 
> One feature in particular that is not present twice is some of the
> caching. This is sort of why they named it "hyperthreading". If you can
> get multiple threads of the same process, sharing the same memory, to
> run simultaneously, there is a performance boost. But if you try to run
> two completely different processes simultaneously, there will actually
> be a performance LOSS because of all the cache misses this will cause.
> 
> --Greg
> 
> 
As far as I can tell both cores have their separate 1M cache. But
lshw-gui reports HT is supported but looking at the files in /sys makes
me doubt it. For example:
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu1/online
does not exist. But that may be because the BIOS has turned HT off.
--
=======================================================================
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux