On 11/12/2009 08:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:03:59 -0500, Kevin wrote: > > >> On 11/12/2009 10:32 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/2009 07:51 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:25:45PM -0800, Brian Mury wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 12:23 -0800, Brian Mury wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> ipstate >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Replace all occurrences of "ipstate" in my post with "iptstate". Oops! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Known problem -- the maintainer made a minor mistake and this should >>>> be cleared up shortly. Just wait until tomorrow and try again. >>>> Fedora contributors are working on tools that in the future will help >>>> minimize these occurrences. If anyone would like to get involved to >>>> solve the problem, they're always welcome! >>>> >>>> >>> Um, really? One down and one more to go! >>> >>> Still a problem:: >>> =========== >>> nufw-2.2.21-3.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems >>> --> Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 is needed by >>> package nufw-2.2.21-3.fc11.i586 (installed) >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 is needed by >>> package nufw-2.2.21-3.fc11.i586 (installed) >>> >> Wait for your mirror to sync up. I was successful late last night >> re-installing iptstate (I removed it temporarily before they said to wait). >> > You don't understand. > > Take a close look at above quote. > > There are other packages than iptstate affected. The maintainer seems > to have ignored the broken deps report. > Ugh, ok, I missed that! Thanks! -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
