> Maybe I'm not being clear enough. IMHO, if a file--especially something > as basic as resolv.conf--exists, it should never be overwritten by some > app without backing it up first. Think of all those .rpmnew files, for > instance. It seems to me a bit ridiculous that NM would just blow away > the file like that. ESPECIALLY as it replaces the contents with nothing > but comments. > > I think this is a huge oversight. It's an all-or-nothing approach that > leaves a box blind to DNS if the user decides (as in my case) that NM is > not actually required/desired. > > Thanks for the tip about PEERDNS, though. > I agree about a resolv.conf backup... unless one is already done somewhere?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
