Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 10/07/2009 08:42 AM, Julian Aloofi wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 06.10.2009, 12:57 -0700 schrieb Mike Cloaked: >>> Does anyone know if it is still current practice to set SELinux to >>> permissive >>> before doing a spin re-build in mock/pungi in F11? >>> >>> Or has selinux policy now reached the point of refinement such that >>> running >>> a respin build works fine with selinux enforcing? >>> >>> Would be useful to know - I have not done respin builds since F10 so I >>> am a >>> little out of touch with current practice. >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Mock-Pungi-and-selinux-for-building-re-spins-in-f11-tp25775562p25775562.html >>> Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> Yes, that's still required to successfully build a re-spin in pungi and >> revisor if I remember correctly. >> > Could someone send me a list of AVC's. Is this the same problem that > livecd has? Building a different OS, causes it's policy to be loaded > during the install. We should be able to convince the Mock environment > that SELinux is disabled, and then allow mock the ability to put down the > labels like we do with livecd. > > Dan, I'll try and do a test build in the next couple of days, and post AVCs if they pop up - would it be best to do this in a BZ report, rather than to Fedora list? If so which component? selinux or mock/pungi? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mock-Pungi-and-selinux-for-building-re-spins-in-f11-tp25775562p25791306.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
