On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 09:02 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > some of the fedora lists mung reply-to, I strip them out so that > it doesn't break the reply function (which is only supposed to reply > to the address(es) in the from header). Umm, no. That's NOT the case that it should ONLY reply to the from header. It IS the case that in the absence of a reply-to header it uses the from header, but where the reply-to header exists it should ONLY reply to the reply-to header address(es). Do more reading about how e-mail works... The reply-to header is an overriding instruction. In general, you press reply to reply to a message, and your mail client does what it's supposed to do (as I just outlined, above). A reply-all feature is a special function for replying in an usual manner (one that the message you're replying to hasn't been preset for). Such as ignoring the reply-to override. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
