I have installed FC10 on my PC. I am using BSNL braodband. Recently i tried to add programes . but the message came that no network connection available. Actually i am using internet and every time i have to use internat i use to start the network service. How can i activate this through Network Manager so that i can upgrade the system. Thanks in advance. VINOD KUMAR GULERIA ADD/AERO VSSC, TRIVANDRUMKERLA- 695022 0471-2564429,2564938(OFFICE)+91 9447109608 (RES) --- On Sun, 9/6/09, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 67, Issue 33 > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 6:54 AM > Send fedora-list mailing list > submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' > to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more > specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Cannot upgrade to F11: /usr/tmp is > not a symbolic link??? > (Mike Wright) > 2. Re: Cannot upgrade to F11: /usr/tmp is > not a symbolic link??? > (Dan Hensley) > 3. Re: Cannot upgrade to F11: /usr/tmp is > not a symbolic link??? > (Kevin J. Cummings) > 4. Re: stream goes broken when listening > to some radio (Antonio M) > 5. Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > (Bob Goodwin) > 6. Re: Thunderbird config date > non-compat.- (David Boles) > 7. Re: Thunderbird config date > non-compat.- (Bob Goodwin) > 8. Re: Thunderbird config date > non-compat.- > (Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)) > 9. Re: Thunderbird config date > non-compat.- (g) > 10. Re: Howto upgrade from FC10 > FC11 > (Jussi Lehtola) > 11. Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- (Bob > Goodwin) > 12. Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > (Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)) > 13. Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- (Bob > Goodwin) > 14. Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- (g) > 15. Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- (Bob > Goodwin) > 16. Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > (Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:16:11 -0700 > From: Mike Wright <mike.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Cannot upgrade to F11: /usr/tmp is not a > symbolic link??? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA31B6B.6060100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Mike Wright wrote: > >>> # ll -d /usr/tmp > >>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 2009-07-28 07:31 > /usr/tmp -> ../var/tmp > >> shouldn't that be ../../var/tmp ? > > > > Why? When you're in /usr, it's only one .. to > get to /var. > > my bad. don't know what I wasn't thinking ;) > thnx > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:19:52 -0600 > From: Dan Hensley <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Cannot upgrade to F11: /usr/tmp is not a > symbolic link??? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP114513DE1FE4B5F5DC3D78E1EC0@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 22:01 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote: > > On 09-09-05 19:05:48, Dan Hensley wrote: > > > I'm trying to upgrade my Fedora 9 system to > Fedora 11 from DVD, but > > > right after I identify my partition, it gives me > an error saying > > > that /usr/tmp is not a symbolic link, so please > reset it to its > > > original > > > state. > > > > > > The problem is, /usr/tmp IS in its original > state. It was a symbolic > > > link pointing to /var/tmp. But I changed it > anyway to be a symbolic > > > link pointing to /tmp instead, and the installer > is still > > > complaining. > > > > > > How do I get past this? I've Googled but > have not found any > > > resolutions--only one other person with a similar > question, but no > > > answer. > > > > WAG: permissions? owner? > > > > # ll -d /usr/tmp > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 2009-07-28 07:31 /usr/tmp > -> ../var/tmp > > > Here's mine (I recreated the original link again): > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 2009-09-05 17:11 /usr/tmp -> > /var/tmp > > So it seems that permissions isn't the issue. Strange > thing is, I've > never messed with this link. I suspect the installer > is just printing > the wrong error message. > > Dan > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:41:08 -0400 > From: "Kevin J. Cummings" <cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Cannot upgrade to F11: /usr/tmp is not a > symbolic link??? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA32144.1000102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 09/05/2009 10:19 PM, Dan Hensley wrote: > > > Here's mine (I recreated the original link again): > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 2009-09-05 17:11 /usr/tmp > -> /var/tmp > > No, the link needs to be relative! When anaconda > runs, it mounts your > root filesystem under its own. If you have any > absolute links, the will > point to anaconda's filesystem instead of yours! > > > So it seems that permissions isn't the issue. > Strange thing is, I've > > never messed with this link. I suspect the > installer is just printing > > the wrong error message. > > Its not the installer, fix your link. > > > Dan > > -- > Kevin J. Cummings > kjchome@xxxxxxx > cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 06:53:14 +0200 > From: Antonio M <antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: stream goes broken when listening to some > radio > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <4c37b6af0909052153l2f20aec3mac4119e295f28494@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > 2009/9/6 jack craig <jackc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > how bizzare, for me, adding it fixed my issue! :) > > > > as long as the sound is flowing, why question the > gods?! > > > > cheers, ... > > > > > jack > > removing tsched=0 made Rhythmbox work for more than two > hours, but the > issue is still there, now I am testing on a different > hardware of my > notebook. > I guess that the component to file against is alsa-lib, not > sure anyway > > -- > Antonio Montagnani > Skype : antoniomontag > SIP: antoniomontag@xxxxxxxxx > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:23:07 -0400 > From: Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA3716B.2010509@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > > I've replaced F-10 on this computer with F-11 using the > Omega live cd > and so far everything seems perfect for the stuff that I > use. One of the > easiest Linux installs yet! And a lot of bandwidth was > saved in doing > the updates! That's an important factor with the limited > bandwidth usage > allocated by my ISP. > > The version of Thunderbird provided however is not > compatible with the > "config date" add-on which I want in order to display 24 > hour local > times for both the sender and myself. The patch is not > available for > this version. What to do? It appears that I need to replace > with version > 2.-something. Is there something I am missing here, am I > unique in > needing 24 hour time displayed? > > [bobg@box9 ~]$ yum whatprovides > */thunderbird > > thunderbird-3.0-2.6.b3.fc11.i586 : Mozilla Thunderbird > mail/newsgroup client > Repo > : installed > Matched from: > Filename : > /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.0b3/thunderbird > Filename : > /usr/bin/thunderbird > > > > [bobg@box9 ~]$ yum whatprovides > */thunderbird-2.* > Loaded plugins: presto, > refresh-packagekit > No Matches found > > Any suggestions? > > Bob > > This should be in "plain text" if I have the configuration > set right. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:10:45 -0400 > From: David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <4AA37C95.9070408@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On 9/6/2009 4:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > > I've replaced F-10 on this computer with F-11 using > the Omega live cd > > and so far everything seems perfect for the stuff that > I use. One of the > > easiest Linux installs yet! And a lot of bandwidth was > saved in doing > > the updates! That's an important factor with the > limited bandwidth usage > > allocated by my ISP. > > > > The version of Thunderbird provided however is not > compatible with the > > "config date" add-on which I want in order to display > 24 hour local > > times for both the sender and myself. The patch is not > available for > > this version. What to do? It appears that I need to > replace with version > > 2.-something. Is there something I am missing here, am > I unique in > > needing 24 hour time displayed? > > > > [bobg@box9 ~]$ yum > whatprovides */thunderbird > > > thunderbird-3.0-2.6.b3.fc11.i586 : Mozilla Thunderbird > > mail/newsgroup client > > Repo > : installed > > Matched from: > > Filename : > /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.0b3/thunderbird > > Filename : > /usr/bin/thunderbird > > > > > > > > [bobg@box9 ~]$ yum > whatprovides */thunderbird-2.* > > Loaded plugins: presto, > refresh-packagekit > > No Matches found > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Bob > > > > This should be in "plain text" if I have the > configuration set right. > > > > > > Nightly Tester Tools > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/6543 > -- > > > David > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 833 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090906/d8954c6b/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:35:19 -0400 > From: Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA38257.1020103@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > On 06/09/09 05:10, David Boles wrote: > > > > > > Nightly Tester Tools > > > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/6543 > > > > There's a lot of stuff there but I found nothing relative > to my problem ... > > Of course I may not know how to deal with that site > either? > > Bob > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:42:47 +0100 > From: "Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)" <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA38417.5030608@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 06/09/09 10:35, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > On 06/09/09 05:10, David Boles wrote: > >> > >> > >> Nightly Tester Tools > >> > >> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/6543 > >> > > > > There's a lot of stuff there but I found nothing > relative to my problem ... > > > > Of course I may not know how to deal with that site > either? > > > > Bob > > > > > > The Nightly Tester Tools > will force your date plugin to install :) > install the Nightly tester. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:02:45 +0000 > From: g <geleem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA388C5.1010303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > hey bob, > > still trying to get 24 hr with out searching first, eh? :D > > > Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > Any suggestions? > > have a look at these links. granted, 3.0b1pre, but may be > worth a try; > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/901 > > then; > http://www.thunderbird-mail.de/wiki/ConfigDate_(English) > > > > This should be in "plain text" if I have the > configuration set right. > > you lucked out getting it right. :) > > > -- > > peace out. > > tc,hago. > > g > . > > **** > in a free world without fences, who needs gates. > ** > help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend > today. > ** > to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. > to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at > it. > ** > learn linux: > 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html > 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ > 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html > 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ > **** > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 253 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090906/37485656/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 13:11:07 +0300 > From: Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Howto upgrade from FC10 > FC11 > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1252231867.2534.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 18:54 -0400, Jim wrote: > > I ran Preupgrade on a X86_64 from FC10 > FC11, it > was a flawless upgrade. > > > > And then I did a Preupgrade on a FC10 > FC11 i386 > box following the > > Fedora instructions and it turn into a nightmare. > > It upgraded all the packages from FC10 > FC11 > except for the kernel, > > after the completion of upgrade I end up with a > FC10 boot kernel and > > FC11 packages. > > And it crashed on reboot. > > > > I'm thinking of upgrading another i386 box from FC10 > > FC11, but this > > time after doing a "yum clean all" I'm thinking of > just upgrading to the > > fedora-release.fc11.i386.rpm's and doing a update . > > > > Is this a good or bad ideal ?? > > It's worked for me so far on a dozen or so systems. > > Just remember to do the upgrade in > a) a screen session > or > b) in the console > as your X session will probably crash during the upgrade. > The best is to > go to initlevel 3 (or even 1) and run the upgrade. > -- > Jussi Lehtola > Fedora Project Contributor > jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:13:14 -0400 > From: Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA38B3A.8030708@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 06/09/09 05:42, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote: > > On 06/09/09 10:35, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > >> On 06/09/09 05:10, David Boles wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Nightly Tester Tools > >>> > >>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/6543 > >>> > >>> > >> There's a lot of stuff there but I found nothing > relative to my problem ... > >> > >> Of course I may not know how to deal with that > site either? > >> > >> Bob > >> > >> > >> > > The Nightly Tester Tools > > will force your date plugin to install :) > > install the Nightly tester. > > > > > It still wont install, I click on "Force Install" but it > doesn't install - > > ConfigDate 0.6.1 could not be installed > because it is not compatible > with Thunderbird 3.0b3. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:22:29 +0100 > From: "Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)" <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA38D65.4060309@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 06/09/09 11:13, Bob Goodwin wrote: > --snip-- > >> The Nightly Tester Tools > >> will force your date plugin to install :) > >> install the Nightly tester. > >> > >> > > It still wont install, I click on "Force Install" but > it doesn't install - > > > > ConfigDate 0.6.1 could not be installed > because it is not compatible > > with Thunderbird 3.0b3. > > Just tested same result. > > Now the old fashioned way. > 1: Extract the contects of > configdate-0.6.1-tb.xpi > 2: edit > install.rdf > 3: change > <em:maxVersion>3.0b1pre</em:maxVersion> > to 3.1 > > 4: save new install.rdf > > Now repakage contents to configdate-0.6.1.-tb-modified.xpi > (keep safe for future use) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:31:46 -0400 > From: Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA38F92.6070901@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > On 06/09/09 06:02, g wrote: > > hey bob, > > > > still trying to get 24 hr with out searching first, > eh? :D > > > > How much searching do you suggest I do before asking? > > > > > Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > > > >> Any suggestions? > >> > > have a look at these links. granted, 3.0b1pre, but may > be worth a try; > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/901 > > > > then; > > http://www.thunderbird-mail.de/wiki/ConfigDate_(English) > > > > > > > This is all stuff I have read. > > Thanks > > Bob > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:45:51 +0000 > From: g <geleem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA392DF.9030503@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > How much searching do you suggest I do before asking? > <snip> > > This is all stuff I have read. > > lol. being that you had not mentioned doing any... > > anyway, i would give frank m's 'old fashion way' a try, > because i recall > a few other post where users were having problems with > 'old' add-ons not > working with new releases until they change 'maxversion' > and they had > satisfactory results. > > add-on authors will set 'maxversion' so that users will not > have unknown > problems occur. ymmv, but it is worth trying. > > -- > > peace out. > > tc,hago. > > g > . > > **** > in a free world without fences, who needs gates. > ** > help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend > today. > ** > to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. > to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at > it. > ** > learn linux: > 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html > 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ > 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html > 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ > **** > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 253 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090906/8f5a5a66/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:50:01 -0400 > From: Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA393D9.6060905@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 06/09/09 06:22, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote: > > On 06/09/09 11:13, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > --snip-- > > > >>> The Nightly Tester Tools > >>> will force your date plugin to install :) > >>> install the Nightly tester. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> It still wont install, I click on "Force Install" > but it doesn't install - > >> > >> ConfigDate 0.6.1 could not > be installed because it is not compatible > >> with Thunderbird 3.0b3. > >> > > Just tested same result. > > > > Now the old fashioned way. > > 1: Extract the contects of > > configdate-0.6.1-tb.xpi > > 2: edit > > install.rdf > > 3: change > > <em:maxVersion>3.0b1pre</em:maxVersion> > > to 3.1 > > > > 4: save new install.rdf > > > > Now repakage contents to > configdate-0.6.1.-tb-modified.xpi > > (keep safe for future use) > > > > > I think I did every thing right and: > > ConfigDate 0.6.1 could not be installed because it is not > compatible > with Thunderbird 3.0b3. > > I guess I need to "zip" the file before saving as an "xpi" > > I'm not sure it's worth all this, might have been easier to > install an > earlier version ot T-bird! > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:54:20 +0100 > From: "Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)" <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Thunderbird config date non-compat.- > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4AA394DC.2040205@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 06/09/09 11:50, Bob Goodwin wrote: > --snip-- > >> > > I think I did every thing right and: > > > > ConfigDate 0.6.1 could not be installed because it is > not compatible > > with Thunderbird 3.0b3. > > > > I guess I need to "zip" the file before saving as an > "xpi" > > Yes, save all under the folder as *.zip, then renmae *.zip > to *.xpi > > > > > I'm not sure it's worth all this, might have been > easier to install an > > earlier version ot T-bird! > > > > You could, I just yesterday updated to TB 3.0b3 > Whether you can still get 3.x on a mirror? > F10 only has 2.x iirc > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 67, Issue 33 > ******************************************* > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
