On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 21:33 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > Sorry Patrick, but our govco snoops have been bragging they have skype > decoded now for about 2 years. If by "decoded" you mean "payload encryption broken routinely without the use of keyloggers or Trojans", do you have a reference? > And I assume skype has been changing things too, but whatever one > group can do, another group can undo. Its just the > nature of the internet for that to happen. That's a seductive generalization, but it *is* a generalization. It's meaningless without more specificity. For example, crypto is entirely based on one group doing something which another group cannot undo with any realistic set of resources. Yes, crypto can be poorly implemented (which is a big argument in favour of open source) but it can also be extremely secure if done right. Is it done right in Skype? I don't know, but to date I know of no evidence to suggest it has problems. I'd be interested to hear if you have any. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines