Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:22:03 +0930
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908201026170.20492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908170821540.6251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1250779641.3265.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908201026170.20492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:28 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> It looks like the thing for me to do is to
> change to fedora 11 before fedora 9 is EOLed.

Well, that's already happened.  But suspend to disk, or RAM, also worked
on the same laptop running Fedora 9, for me.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

References:
- nvidia vs suspend to disk
  - From: Michael Hennebry
- Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
  - From: Tim
- Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
  - From: Michael Hennebry

Prev by Date: Re: capital letters in firefox
Next by Date: Unable to kill runaway app. -
Previous by thread: Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
Next by thread: Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]