Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk

• To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
• From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:22:03 +0930
• In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908201026170.20492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908170821540.6251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1250779641.3265.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908201026170.20492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:28 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> It looks like the thing for me to do is to
> change to fedora 11 before fedora 9 is EOLed.

Well, that's already happened.  But suspend to disk, or RAM, also worked
on the same laptop running Fedora 9, for me.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• References:
  • nvidia vs suspend to disk
    • From: Michael Hennebry
  • Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
    • From: Tim
  • Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
    • From: Michael Hennebry

• Prev by Date: Re: capital letters in firefox
• Next by Date: Unable to kill runaway app. -
• Previous by thread: Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
• Next by thread: Re: nvidia vs suspend to disk
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread