Re: F12 networkmanager, anyone else worried by this?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>> Is anyone able to reassure me that NM will finally work this time?
> 
> The best way is to run Rawhide for testing, provide feedback and
> reassure yourself.

Although NM is much more reliable than it used to be, in my experience,
it still has a number of major faults:

1. There is an almost complete lack of documentation;

2. It still occasionally gets into a loop, where it repeatedly
asks for the encryption key.

3. The connection is always lost (in my case) after Suspend to RAM.

4. The NM messages in /var/log/messages are mostly incomprehensible.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux