On 07/21/2009 02:25 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> Article: http://oswatershed.org/ >> >> That's much higher than I would have guessed. I suppose Fedora is no >> longer as fast paced as it used to be. Arch seems to be the innovating >> distro now. >> > What I don't understand is how they figure it. Are they only > comparing 20 packages to get the percentage? It seems so and he is not considering the time since last release which is why OpenSUSE is claimed to be 90% "obsolete". In other words, this analysis has deep flaws. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
