On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 07:30 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > might it be useful to simply remove the appropriate printer
> > support package(s), then re-install them fresh to get rid of any
> > misconfiguration i might have introduced? like, perhaps, removing
> > all of printer support just to play it safe?
>
> Better to file a bug report so we can get to the bottom of the
> problem and know the solution in future I think.
before i do that, i think it's worth trying to reproduce the problem
by configuring that printer the fedora-approved way from the
beginning. recall that i downloaded from samsung the smart panel and
unified driver. should i have done it that way? or should i have
been able to configure that printer (samsung scx-4826fn) with what
came shipped strictly with fedora? because if that's the case,
submitting a bug report based on what i got from samsung might be
completely meaningless.
*theoretically*, how should i have configured that printer? because
i should at least try it that way to see if the problem still exists.
rday
p.s. right now, if i go into System > Admin > Printing, i have a
single entry for "SCX-4x26-Series", which strikes me as correct. but
i'll file a BZ report if you think it's worth it.
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
