| From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> | Scott Beamer wrote: | > SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 | > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: | > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE | > UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE | > 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 100 100 000 Old_age Always | > - 9633546 | | That is really a lot, typically my three year old drives are showing single | digits, often zero. "9633546" is the "RAW_VALUE". That may not be the count of ECC errors recovered. Interpretation of RAW_VALUE depends on the drive manufacturer. I know that this seems counter-intuitive. If you google, you will find a bunch of people worried about high numbers here. Some notice it going up faster than the number of reads performed. All you can go on is the VALUE, WORST, and THRESH numbers. They say the drive is fine, trust us. I added "trust us" because the manufacturer's firmware came up with that number in a non-transparent way. On some Seagate drives, people have figured out that certain raw numbers are actually two numbers stuck together: some bits are for one count and some bits are for another. Here's an insufficiently descriptive FAQ entry on this topic: http://www.readynas.com/forum/faq.php#My_hard_disk%28s%29_in_ReadyNAS_is_reporting_high_SMART_Raw_Read_Error_Rate%2C_Seek_Error_Rate%2C_and_Hardware_ECC_Recovered._What_should_I_do%3F -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines