On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 01:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > This snippet might be of interest: > > > grep lm /proc/cpuinfo >/dev/null && [ `uname -m` != x86_64 ] && echo 'Your > > > CPU is 64-bit-capable, you are running a 32-bit OS, why???' > > > > > > Kevin Kofler > > > > Kevin, > > > > That would be a good addition !!! However I have some 64-bit > > machines I wish had had the 32 bit os on because there are still a > > some things that I have not been able to work with adobe flash on > > 64 but work easily on 32. > > Adobe has made a BETA version of their flash player available (last > September). It is not packaged in an RPM, but only consists of one > .so file that needs to be put in your /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins > dir. It works just fine (as compared to using the 32 bit plugin > with a 32_64 bit wrapper): > > libflashplayer-10.0.d21.1.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz > there appears to be a newer version than the above: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry: Have classroom, will lecture. http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA ======================================================================== -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
