Re: fedora LTS , why not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:35:16AM +0100, Adel ESSAFI wrote:
> Hi list
> 
> 
> I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite
> distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with
> Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support).
> 
> My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with
> 1. LTS
> 2. with a very reduce number of packages
> 3. with proprietary codecs and essentiel software (mp3, flash ) included in.

This sounds exactly like plain old Red Hat Enterprise Linux or CentOS,
with added EL-5 package support from RPM Fusion.  In other words, this
seems like a somewhat duplicative effort.  If I'm not mistaken, you
could simply provide people a kickstart file they could use with the
existing CentOS and RPM Fusion libraries to do this.

Paul

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux