Tim wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 15:01 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: >> On this list, the Reply-To header is not rewritten - one is added >> pointing back to the list. If you have your own Reply-To, then >> replies show up for both. I have to delete the sender's address on >> about 25% of the messages I send. > > I usually don't bother to do that. I (quite rightly) presume that > they've deliberately added their address, and want private copies. > That's the proper way to respond to a message with more than one > reply-to address (reply to all of them). > > If they're silly enough to have just put their address in the > reply-to(*) header, as well, without realising that you shouldn't do > that by default, that's their problem. Otherwise, I mightn't be > replying to some people who've deliberately set things to work that way. > > It's not up to me to try and second guess whether they know what they're > doing, or not. > The problem I run into is that they reply to me, instead of the list. I guess I should really create another email address just for the Fedora lists... Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
