Re: Extending Expiration Date of an Already-Expired GPG Key

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 22:33 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> Robert L Cochran wrote:
> > Thanks everyone for pointing this problem out to me. How do I fix it? I
> > don't sign my emails that much but when I do I'd like a valid signature
> > to show up. Clearly I'm doing something wrong.
> 
> The basic issue is that not all keyservers "know" about the update.  For
> instance, pgp.mit.edu did not when I checked:
> 
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys C2C60518; gpg --list-keys C2C60518
> gpg: requesting key C2C60518 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
> gpg: key C2C60518: "Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt)
> <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" not changed
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:              unchanged: 1
> pub   1024D/C2C60518 2008-01-19 [expired: 2009-01-18]
> uid                  Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> However, the server you used did:
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys C2C60518; gpg --list-keys
> C2C60518
> gpg: requesting key C2C60518 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
> gpg: key C2C60518: "Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt)
> <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 2 new signatures
> gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
> gpg: depth: 0  valid:   1  signed:   0  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:         new signatures: 2
> pub   1024D/C2C60518 2008-01-19 [expires: 2010-02-21]
> uid                  Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This can be remedied by sending to the uninformed keyservers.
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --send-keys C2C60518
> gpg: sending key C2C60518 to hkp server pgp.mit.edu
> 
> Then, we see pgp.mit.edu is now aware of the update.
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys C2C60518; gpg --list-keys C2C60518
> gpg: requesting key C2C60518 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
> gpg: key C2C60518: "Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt)
> <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" not changed
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:              unchanged: 1
> pub   1024D/C2C60518 2008-01-19 [expires: 2010-02-21]
> uid                  Robert L. Cochran (Greenbelt) <cochranb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Of course, the key servers ordinarily share keys amongst themselves
> every so often.  But a manual update can't hurt.

I used the pgp.mit.edu server, but I thought I was OK as the magic
number C2C60518 was correct. I assumed that was a hash of the actual key
and hence would change when the key was updated, but apparently it's
merely an index.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux