I wrote: > Matthew Flaschen wrote: >> The basic issue is that not all keyservers "know" about the update. For >> instance, pgp.mit.edu did not when I checked: > > Oh well. That keyserver should not be used anymore. It uses outdated > keyserver software and is known to mangle subkeys, for one. It's use > should be discouraged. > > http://marc.info/?l=gnupg-users&m=123367018729467&w=2 Hmm, not that I wanted to distract from the general point that not all the keyservers are in sync. So if I did, apologies. :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Foxes prefer rabbits with short claws. -- Nadja Adolf
Attachment:
pgpBVmHuc9E40.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
