Tim wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 20:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> I guess I only have one question.... >> >> This was discussed and decided upon in August 2008 in the thread with >> the title "The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list" and no objections >> were raised at that time. >> > > I wonder whether any of the participants expected the list description > to be stuffed into the "to address"? (There are other headers, more > suitable for that, that can be read for search engine categorisation.) > Probably not.... And it took "only" 5+ months for anyone to take exception to it...and even then only as an off shoot to a different trivial matter. > It looks silly, but it's not /that/ important. I'd far rather put more > effort into getting the "unsubscribe" link in the signature relabelled > as "subscription options," or something similarly more descriptive > (subscription settings, or subscription choices, etc.), but still very > short, instead of just unsubscribe. There has to be any number of > people who won't click on it, thinking they'll unsubscribe themselves, > when they wanted to change some aspect of their subscription, instead. > > Maybe you need to start a different thread on that.... Or, maybe just address it to the folks from that August thread that seem to be in a position to change that sort of thing. -- Having local spies means employing the services of the inhabitants of a district. --The Art of War by Sun Tzu Chapter XIII: The Use of Spies Mei-Mei.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
