Re: Feature Proposal: Rolling Updates (was Re: WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Haney wrote:
> Alan Evans wrote:
>> But what about appbar that also requires libfoo? Unless I'm
>> misunderstanding how Gentoo works (which is possible), you don't need
>> to redownload appbar because libfoo was updated. You only need to
>> recompile appbar after updating libfoo.
> 
> Not exactly.  If libfoo gets updated you must rebuild appfoo against the
> new libraries.  And, unless you have the source tarball cached on the
> system (which portage does cache but like cleaning up yum doesn't keep
> everything) you will need to download the source again and recompile.
> 
Normally, you only need to recompile if there is a major version in
the library. If it is a minor version change, it is supposed to be
backward compatible. So if your program was compiled against
libfoo-1.2.1, and you upgrade to libfoo-1.2.5, it is supposed to
still work. Now a program compiled against libfoo-1.2.5 may not work
with libfoo-1.2.1.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux