Bruno Wolff III wrote: > What are you trying to accomplish? It has been known almost from the start > of virus scanning, that blacklists were a broken way to do things. So there > really isn't a need to get a list of viruses or worms. If you want lists, > you want lists of code that is OK to run. in discussions on other lists and some local friends that run ms, i would like to know numbers, not guesstimate's of what is what. just to say to me some random number or percent is not acceptable, and i do not wish to do same. and as for failures of 'blacklist', i do agree. my isp had you post held up in 'mail guard'. :) why, i do not know, but they do now know that it was in error. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
