Ed Greshko wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>> >>> Hummm..... It leaves quite a bit open to interpretation and it would >>> only link one message with one reply. I was looking for something more >>> all encompassing. But never mind.... >>> >>> >> Linking the reply to the original message is all that's required, >> given that every message *must* include a standard Message-ID header. >> >> >> > Which isn't, IMHO, threading. It is, as you say, simple linking. > > FWIW, I've found that RFC 2822 has a better discussion of the use of "in-reply-to" and "references" headers and their intended usage. -- "Ain't that something what happened today. One of us got traded to Kansas City." -- Casey Stengel, informing outfielder Bob Cerv he'd been traded. Mei-Mei.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
