Gerhard Magnus wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM
I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few
months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on
a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports,
but at least three required policy changes.
You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with
SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs
with SELinux. ;)
Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily.
Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable.
Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from
updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues.
FIX!!
I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind
started without issues.
As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but
installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres
did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by "and
targeted"?
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-*
That will install
selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm
selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm
and possibly, if you have it installed,
selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm
Now your system works again for NFS.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
