On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS > > From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> > > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM > > > >> I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few > >> months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on > >> a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, > >> but at least three required policy changes. > >> > > > > You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with > > SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs > > with SELinux. ;) > > > > Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. > > Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. > > > Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from > updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. > > FIX!! > > I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind > started without issues. > As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Where did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by "and targeted"? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
