On Friday 12 December 2008 19:48:44 Anne Wilson wrote: > On Friday 12 December 2008 19:10:52 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Anne Wilson wrote: > > > One question - is this a packaging report, i.e. Fedora, or a KDE issue? > > > I don't want to report it to the wrong place. > > > > Packaging (actually "comps", our lists which decide which packages are > > mandatory/default/optional for which groups), so it's a Fedora issue. > > > > Still, I'm not convinced installing GDB by default is a good idea, it > > takes up a significant place on the live images and the backtraces won't > > be all that useful if you don't also install the -debuginfo packages > > (which definitely don't fit on the live CD). > > There has to be a sane answer to this. We want bug reports to be made, and > we want the best info we can get. Someone has taken the trouble to write > the application that captures the bug info and makes it easier to send the > report, yet without those packages it's not possible. > > If it's not sensible to putting it on the release disks, is it possible to > trigger the installation in some way? Something that asks if you want to > install them, or recommend them from the first update? > In fact the prompt proposed by Todd Denniston seems the best answer. Perhaps that would be the best basis for a bug/wish report. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
