On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Niels Weber <nathelbiya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber <nathelbiya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber <nathelbiya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. >>>> >>>> I think you mean "not all 32-bit programs you want to run will work". >>> >>> All dynamically linked 32bit programs will not work. >>> >>> Is that better? >> >> That depends on what you mean. You're saying that no >> dynamically-linked 32-bit program will work. If you mean that some >> will and some won't, then that's not what you're saying. > > I'm talking of those you don't get the source for obviously. > > If I'm wrong in that, please explain how such a program would work. By linking to 32-bit libraries? Multilib support is precisely for this situation, as far as I'm aware. I've never had a 32-bit app fail to run on my 64-bit system, e.g. 32-bit Firefox works fine (though I now use the 64-bit version). poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
