Jeff Spaleta wrote: > And there is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from putting the > resources together and charging money for security updates post-EOL > for any Fedora release if they thought there was a market for that and > individuals were willing to pay for that sort of service in a > sustainable way. > I think you may have answered your own question..."if they thought there was a market". > At the end of the day, someone is going to have to step up and do the > work to extend the lifetime of Fedora releases. Because the entirety > of our process uses open software, our current process is replicable, > without relying on the Fedora Project to bless it. Under the new > trademark policy, I believe that such a 3rd party repository would > still qualify as a Fedora remix even if it were done completely > outside of the control of Fedora itself. Whether or not that work is > done completely by volunteers or people are paid to do it doesn't > really matter, the point is people have to be motivated to do the > work. > > "someone is going to have to step up". I nominate you. :-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
