On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Paul Smith <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> # dir /etc/yum.repos.d/ >>> adobe-linux-i386.repo pptp.repo >>> CRAN.repo remi.repo >>> endurs_i686.repo rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo >>> fedora-rawhide.repo rpmfusion-free.repo >>> fedora.repo rpmfusion-free-updates.repo >>> fedora-updates-newkey.repo rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo >>> fedora-updates.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo >>> fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo rpmfusion-nonfree.repo >>> fedora-updates-testing.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo >>> freshrpms.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo >>> google.repo texlive.repo >> >> You shouldn't have the newkey repositories - they were for F8 or F9 only to >> work around a possibly compromised signing key - is the old fedora-release >> package still installed, or are they files no longer owned by a package? >> rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-newkey.repo >> will tell you if an rpm still claims the file. > > Thanks again. Getting the following: > > # rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-newkey.repo > fedora-release-9-5.transition.noarch > # After having removed fedora-release-9-5.transition.noarch, the problem was solved. Thanks for your help! Paul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
