On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:31 PM, M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> # dir /etc/yum.repos.d/ >> adobe-linux-i386.repo pptp.repo >> CRAN.repo remi.repo >> endurs_i686.repo rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo >> fedora-rawhide.repo rpmfusion-free.repo >> fedora.repo rpmfusion-free-updates.repo >> fedora-updates-newkey.repo rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo >> fedora-updates.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo >> fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo rpmfusion-nonfree.repo >> fedora-updates-testing.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo >> freshrpms.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo >> google.repo texlive.repo > > You shouldn't have the newkey repositories - they were for F8 or F9 only to > work around a possibly compromised signing key - is the old fedora-release > package still installed, or are they files no longer owned by a package? > rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-newkey.repo > will tell you if an rpm still claims the file. Thanks again. Getting the following: # rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-newkey.repo fedora-release-9-5.transition.noarch # Paul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
