Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
To: olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
}
# This is a very basic subnet declaration.
subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
}
It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice.
And stranger
to declare it differently. I see no point for the first
one.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one?
I have tried before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time.
The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to make the server
10.154.19.0 ?
Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing?
Thanks,
Antonio
Dear You,
Please try these :
<>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224
{
range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
option routers
rtr-239-0-1.example.org,rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
}
Good luck !
|
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
