--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
> To: olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> > }
> >
> > # This is a very basic subnet declaration.
> >
> > subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
> > range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
> > option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
> rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
> > }
>
> It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice.
> And stranger
> to declare it differently. I see no point for the first
> one.
>
> --
> [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
> 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
>
> Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
> is ignored. I
> read messages from the public lists.
Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one?
I have tried before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time.
The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to make the server
10.154.19.0 ?
Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing?
Thanks,
Antonio
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
