David Timms wrote:
Casey Dahlin wrote:
So, as most of you have probably heard, we are now on a two-tiered
access system for CVS. The final change which we will be making is the
mass ACL open.
What will happen is all packages which are now set to be private,
accessible by their maintainers and a few specific individuals only,
will be opened up to all überpackager members. Members of überpackager
represent a filtered minority of CVS comitters, but membership is easy
to come by for anyone that asks.
As written here, this sounds risky.
Is it more like:
membership is easy to come by for existing packagers with:
- a good track record
- minimum number of existing packages
- some other qualifier ?
Yes, uberpackagers have these kind of pre-conditions.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007.html
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
