Thanks Mikkel; On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 18:36 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > William Case wrote: > > > > It's OK Mikkel, I gotcha anyways. I have checked rc.sysinit and it does > > a > > 'if [ -x /sbin/lvm ]; then > > action $"Setting up Logical Volume Management:" /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y > > --ignorelockingfailure > > fi > > > > I have no use for lvm. I have thought of either commenting out the > > above statement, or, 'yum remove lvm2' which has a mkinitrd dependency. > > > > Which or whatelse would be the least dangerous? Where did the /sbin/lvm > > come from? I have been careful to NOT install LVM with each new fedora > > installation. If it is being added by the latest kernel upgrade, would > > not this addition of LVM to the rc.sysinit script be a bug? > > Take a look at the timestamps on rc.sysinit - I think it has always > been in there. Considering how seldom the initscripts are updated, > you are probably safe with either option. In your case, I would > probably remove the lvm2 package. (rpm -e --nodeps lvm2) The only > problem would be if you get a drive that has LVM that you need to > read... I have gotten so used to using yum, I had forgotten the rpm ins-and-outs. -- Regards Bill Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3 Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
